The Education (Guidance about Costs of School Uniforms) Bill 2019-20 was introduced by Mike Amesbury MP following the Private Members' Bills Ballot on 9 January 2020. The Bill is supported by the Government.
The Prime Minister said that universities are better funded now “than they have been for a generation”. She also argued that recent reforms have fairly shared the cost of higher education between the taxpayer and students, and enabled the Government to lift the cap on the number of places available. However the Prime Minister expressed disappointment at the lack of a competitive higher education market, with no variable tuition fees according to cost, quality and length of courses.
New briefing paper on the Review
The Augar review of post-18 education was finally published on 30 May 2019. This paper looks at its recommendations and some of the initial responses to it.
The review is to look at how future students will contribute to the cost of their studies, including “the level, terms and duration of their contribution.” The Prime Minister discounted the idea of moving back to a fully taxpayer funded system. It is expected that the review will report in early 2019.
This page will be updated as the review progresses and includes links to related briefing papers.
View or listen to the Library presentation What to expect from the Post-18 education funding review
The terms of reference for the review were published on 19 February 2018. These are set out below:
The review will focus on the following issues:
Choice and competition across a joined-up post-18 education and training sector:
- How we can help young people make effective choices between academic, technical and vocational routes after 18, including information on earnings outcomes and the quality of the teaching they receive.
- How we can support a more dynamic market in provision, taking into account reforms already underway, whilst maintaining the financial sustainability of a world-class higher education and research sector.
- How we can encourage learning that is more flexible (for example, part-time, distance learning and commuter study options) and complements ongoing Government work to support people to study at different times in their lives.
- How to ensure the market provides choice with higher-level degree apprenticeships and shorter and more flexible courses, in particular accelerated degree programmes, and supporting innovative new institutions that can drive competition.
- How we can ensure that there is world-class provision of technical education across the country including through the new Institutes of Technology.
- A system that is accessible to all:
- How we can ensure that people from disadvantaged backgrounds have equal opportunities to progress to and succeed in all forms of post-18 education and training.
- How disadvantaged students and learners receive maintenance support, both from Government and from universities and colleges.
- Delivering the skills our country needs:
- How we can best support education outcomes that deliver our Industrial Strategy ambitions, by contributing to a strong economy and delivering the skills our country needs.
- Value for money for graduates and taxpayers:
- How students and graduates contribute to the cost of their studies including the level, terms and duration of their contribution, while maintaining the link that those who benefit from post18 education contribute to its costs.
- Ensuring that funding arrangements across post-18 education and training are transparent and do not act as barriers to choice or provision, considering how best to promote institutional efficiency and value for money for students and taxpayers.
- How the Government and institutions communicate with students and graduates around student finance, ensuring this communication is as clear as possible (consistent with the relevant legal requirements) about the nature and terms of student support.
The recommendations of the review will be guided by the need to:
- Maintain the principle that students should contribute to the cost of their studies while ensuring that payments are progressive and income contingent;
- Continue with the reforms in train to build a strong technical and further education sector that encourages the skills that we need as a country;
- Place no cap on the number of students who can benefit from post-18 education; and
- Support the role of universities and colleges in delivering the Government’s objectives for science, R&D and the Industrial Strategy.
The review will not make recommendations related to the terms of pre-2012 loans or to taxation, and its recommendations must be consistent with the Government’s fiscal policies to reduce the deficit and have debt falling as a percentage of GDP.
Call for Evidence and Submissions
A Call for Evidence was made on 21 March 2018, Review of Post-18 Education and Funding: Call for Evidence. The evidence received will be used to inform the panel’s thinking on the issues set out in the terms of reference. The consultation ran for 6 weeks and closed on 2 May 2018.
Respondents were asked that submissions should not to exceed 4000 words they were asked to provide evidence and data to support their positions.
Below are a selection of submissions:
- Russell Group – Initial response to the call for evidence on post-18 education and funding
- Universities UK –The importance of the post-18 education system
- Insitute for Fiscal Studies – Response to call for evidence for the post-18 funding review from the Institute for Fiscal Studies
- University Alliance – UA response to the Post-18 & Funding Review call for evidence
- Million+- Review of post-18 education and funding: call for evidence
- Association of Employers and Learning Providers – AELP Response to the review of Post-18 Education and Funding
- University and Colleges Union – Response from the University and College Union (UCU)
- GuildHE – GuildHE’s Principles of Funding Post-18 Education
- Association of Colleges – Written evidence submitted by Association of Colleges
- National Union of Students – National Union of Students response
On the 17 December 2018 the Office for National Statistics (ONS) published a report Accounting for student loans: How we are improving the recording of student loans in government accounts, it had been widely reported that the Augar Review report would be delayed until after the publication of this report. Library blog, Student loans and the Government’s deficit, 13 December 2018 discusses the issues in the ONS report.
The Troubled Families Programme (TFP) is a programme in England administered by the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG). The programme conducts targeted interventions for families experiencing multiple problems, including crime, anti-social behaviour, truancy, unemployment, mental health problems and domestic abuse. This briefing examines the TFP since 2012, details MHCLG evaluations of the programme, and describes recent commentary and potential future directions for the programme.
This House of Commons library paper gives an overview of the first sale of a tranche of English income-contingent student loans. It gives background to the sale and discusses the impact of the sale on borrowers and whether value for money was achieved by the sale. The Government announced the end of the sales programme in Budget 2020.