Defence procurement reform
The government spends billions of pounds each year on defence equipment. This briefing explores how successive governments have approached defence acquisition.
This paper briefly examines the nuclear weapons policies, capabilities and programmes of the United States. This is one paper in a larger series on the nuclear weapon states.
Nuclear weapons at a glance: United States (552 KB , PDF)
The 2022 Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) sets out the current nuclear policies of the US Administration. An unclassified version of the NPR is still awaited but it is thought to place greater reliance on disarmament and US leadership on arms control than the previous NPR led by the Trump administration.
Despite considerable progress in bilateral arms control since the 1970s, the United States still deploys an extensive nuclear force and is in the process of modernising and replacing its nuclear capabilities.
The US is undertaking an extensive modernisation programme across every element of the nuclear triad. The US nuclear programme is estimated to cost $634 billion over the next decade, of which $188 billion will be spent on weapons modernisation. In 2017, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the US modernisation programme would cost at least $1.2 trillion over the next 30 years.
This short paper is intended as an introduction to the United States’ nuclear weapons policies and programmes. It is part of a series of country profiles which are available on the House of Commons Library website.
Nuclear weapons at a glance: United States (552 KB , PDF)
The government spends billions of pounds each year on defence equipment. This briefing explores how successive governments have approached defence acquisition.
From October 2024 the Procurement Act 2023 will replace the current Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 that oversee defence procurement.
As states sanction Russia after its invasion of Ukraine, this briefing sets out the arguments around seizing another state's assets, and explains the intensifying debate on how international law affects sanctions.