UK amends its criteria for arms exports
This paper discusses changes to the licencing criteria for strategic exports from the UK.

What’s the significance of the UK’s departure from the EU for the UK’s 14 Overseas Territories, in relation to trade, funding, defence, and sovereignty?
Brexit and the UK's Overseas Territories (717 KB , PDF)
Many Territory Governments have raised concerns that the UK’s decision to leave the EU has impacted negatively on their access to markets, EU development funding, and funding for environmental protection. The UK Government has pledged to work with the Territories to manage the transition and establish new funding and trading opportunities.
Around 260,000 British nationals live in the ten permanently inhabited OTs. Each inhabited Territory has its own elected government and/or legislature, and UK-appointed Governors retain responsibility for their external affairs. The OTs have no separate international representation or right to negotiate, or agree to, international agreements without the UK’s permission.
Aside from Gibraltar, the Territories were never part of the EU. Instead, like other European territories overseas they were part of an overseas territory association. This gave them access to certain funding and the single market.
Despite the request of the UK Government, the EU declined to allow the Territories to be covered by the UK-EU Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA). Because some OT exports to the EU now face tariffs, Territory governments have raised concerns for their economies and public finances (PDF). They have also cited potential benefits (PDF) including access to Asian markets under new trade agreements and access to UK funding.
OTs access to funding varies, being mainly dependent on their level of income. Many received funding through two EU schemes:
Discussions on replacements are on-going. The UK Government has committed to consider long-term funding and to account for shortfalls when planning. The UK provides its own funding streams to the Territories:
OTs are not automatically covered by the UK free trade agreements, but they can agree to their inclusion in a trade deal should they choose. Some OT goods face tariffs when imported into the EU because they are not covered by the TCA. However, the OTs’ access to the UK market is tariff- and quota-free.
UK-OT trade is heavily concentrated on a small number of Territories. In 2019, the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Gibraltar accounted for 91% of UK exports to and 98% of UK imports from the OTs. Data on the Territories’ EU trade is only available for trade in goods. In 2021, they exported US$0.5 billion and imported US$2.0 billion, resulting in a trade deficit.
As the OTs are not covered by the TCA tariffs are in place for key OT exports, such as fish. This is particularly significant to the Falklands, where fisheries constitute around 35-48% of its Gross Domestic Product (PDF). The UK has provided technical support for the Falklands to navigate the tariffs (PDF).
Argentina disputes UK sovereignty over the Falklands. The Territory’s Government considered the UK’s EU membership to offer “considerable certainty and support” to it. The Argentinian Government has said that it now “expects more support” from the EU following Brexit. The UK continues to reject the claims and stresses the Falkland’s right to self-determination.
Spanish Governments have sought to reclaim Gibraltar by peaceful means. They have also proposed shared or joint sovereignty with the UK. Successive UK Governments have rejected making any changes against the wishes of the Gibraltarians. Gibraltar was not covered by the TCA, and instead a separate agreement is to be negotiated. As of July 2022, discussions are ongoing.
Brexit and the UK's Overseas Territories (717 KB , PDF)
This paper discusses changes to the licencing criteria for strategic exports from the UK.
Information on the UK and international response to the 2023 conflict between Israel and Hamas.
Different parts of the UK have different views on including glass in planned deposit return schemes, which could complicate the UK’s internal market.