Pre-legislative scrutiny under the Conservative Governments of 2015-24
This briefing provides a summary of the development of pre-legislative scrutiny and the draft bills published during the 2015, 2017 and 2019 Parliaments.

A scheme to exclude MPs under investigation for sexual misconduct has been implemented in standing orders.
Risk-based exclusion of MPs (282 KB , PDF)
On 13 May 2024, the House of Commons agreed a risk-based exclusion policy.
The policy is set out in Standing Order No 164.
Under the policy, a risk assessment will take place when the Clerk of the House is informed by the police that an MP has been arrested on suspicion of committing a violent or sexual offence. The risk assessment will be carried out by a panel of MPs appointed by the Speaker.
Taking into account the nature of the alleged misconduct, safeguarding concerns, risks and so on, the panel will decide upon measures to mitigate any risks. Measures could include exclusion from the Parliamentary Estate and exclusion from domestic or foreign travel funded by the House.
An MP who is excluded from the estate may apply for a proxy vote.
The House agreed that the operation of the policy should be reviewed within six months.
On 12 November 2024, the House of Commons Commission published the Risk-based exclusion six-month review (PDF). The review did not propose any changes to the policy, but it recommended raising awareness of the policy and supporting the operation of the panel appointed to undertake risk assessments.
It recommended a further review, after 18 months or after three cases had been considered by the panel, whichever was later.
Concern has been expressed, particularly by parliamentary staff, that MPs who are under investigation for sexual misconduct, or in some cases sexual offences, are continuing to attend Parliament.
In April 2022, the Procedure Committee published a memorandum from the Clerk of the House of Commons on barring MPs from the precincts (PDF). He said:
It is a fundamental constitutional right for Members who have been elected by their constituents to represent them here, and no-one outside the House itself has power to curtail that right.
Although it would be possible for the House, by resolution, to require MPs not to attend Parliament, the Clerk identified two counter-considerations. First, ensuring continued representation for constituents and second, fairness to the individual under investigation.
The issue was then considered by the House of Commons Commission, which employs House staff.
In December 2022, the House of Commons Commission launched a consultation on excluding MPs charged with violent or sexual offences from the Parliamentary Estate and Parliamentary-funded travel (PDF).
On 5 June 2023, the commission published proposals for excluding MPs (PDF) “where the Clerk or the Director of Security for Parliament is presented with credible allegations of sexual or violent offending by the police at any point in the criminal justice process, including but not confined to the point of arrest or charge”.
The exclusions would apply to the Parliamentary Estate and Parliament-funded travel.
The commission also published a risk identification tool (PDF), risk mitigation processes (PDF) and terms of exclusion (PDF).
A debate on ‘risk-based exclusion of Members of Parliament’ was held on 12 June 2023, in the Commons Chamber.
In closing the debate, on 12 June, Penny Mordaunt, the Leader of the House of Commons and a member of the commission, identified issues that would require further consideration by the House of Commons Commission.
At its meeting on 10 July 2023, the commission considered potential amendments (PDF) and agreed to make further proposals to the House after the summer recess.
At its meeting on 23 October 2023, the commission “requested further development of its proposals relating to risk-based exclusion” (PDF).
On 14 December 2023, the House of Commons Commission published updated proposals for a policy on risk-based exclusion of MPs (PDF).
The commission has proposed that when the Clerk of the House is provided with information from the police about an MP who is subject to serious allegations relating to a violent or sexual offence, a risk assessment will take place. In practice, the Clerk would be provided with this information when the MP was arrested, so the risk assessment would also occur on arrest.
In its report, the commission noted the changes made to the policy as originally proposed:
(a) There is no longer a staff panel which makes an initial assessment.
(b) The risk assessment will take into consideration whether there is an existing voluntary arrangement between the Member and their whip to stay away from the Estate.
(c) A risk assessment will be triggered when information is received from the Police regarding serious allegations that a Member has committed a violent or sexual offence. In practice, this will be at the point of arrest.
(d) There will be a review of the operation of the policy after six months
The commission also proposed that excluded MPs would be offered a proxy vote for seven months in the first instance.
The House of Lords Procedure and Privileges Committee proposed a temporary exclusion scheme and a standing order to give it effect (PDF), in a report published on 12 February 2024.
The House of Lords debated the scheme and approved the new standing order on 28 February 2024.
Risk-based exclusion of MPs (282 KB , PDF)
This briefing provides a summary of the development of pre-legislative scrutiny and the draft bills published during the 2015, 2017 and 2019 Parliaments.
A bill briefing on the Church of Scotland (Lord High Commissioner) Bill 2024-25. This makes provision for Catholics to be eligible to hold the office of Lord High Commissioner, which is the King's representative at the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland.
Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the UK has applied sanctions and changed rules around visas and corporate transparency to counter Russian influence.