UK Labour Market Statistics
This paper provides the latest statistics and analysis of employment, unemployment, economic inactivity and earnings in the UK.
Stuart C. McDonald MP (SNP, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) secured a Westminster Hall debate at 4.30pm on Tuesday 3 November 2015.
Maternity Discrimination - Westminster Hall debate (453 KB , PDF)
The subject of the debate is maternity discrimination, particularly in relation to the workplace.
Digital debate
The House of Commons Digital Outreach Team, in partnership with Maternity Action, have also organised a digital debate on maternity discrimination.
The debate will provide a chance for the public to share their experiences and raise issues that they would like to see discussed during the Westminster Hall debate.
The maternity discrimination digital debate will take place on Monday 2 November 2015 from 10-11am.
You can join in or follow the discussion on Twitter using #MothersWork.
Despite legal protections, pregnancy and maternity discrimination in the workplace is widespread. Research published in July this year by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) found, among other things:
The BIS & EHRC report contained the first findings from research based on interviews with 3,034 employers and 3,254 mothers. It is expected that two further final reports will be published in November, making policy recommendations for government.
Although the research is relatively new, the findings come as no surprise to commentators. A report published by Maternity Action in 2013 noted:
In 2005, three years before the global financial crisis of late 2008 and subsequent recession, a landmark study by the Equal Opportunities Commission found that half of all pregnant women suffered a related disadvantage at work, and that each year 30,000 were forced out of their job. Eight years on, all the available evidence suggests that such pregnancy and maternity discrimination is now more common than ever before, and that as many as 60,000 women are pushed out of work each year.
Following that report, the Alliance Against Pregnancy Discrimination (made up of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy; the Fawcett Society; Maternity Action; NCT; the Royal College of Midwives; the TUC; UNISON; Unite; Working Families; and YESS) published a manifesto prior to the 2015 General Election, calling for:
Campaigning organisations have highlighted the difficulty women face in challenging maternity discrimination, particularly in view of changes to legal aid and the introduction in 2013 of employment tribunal fees. A Maternity Action briefing prepared for the Westminster Hall debate noted:
On 15 October 2015, the Minister for Women and Equalities, Nicky Morgan, set out the Government’s position in response to oral questions on the steps the Government is taking to tackle pregnancy and maternity discrimination in the workplace:
Pregnancy and maternity discrimination is unlawful and completely unacceptable. The Government and the Equality and Human Rights Commission are working together on the largest independent research project of its kind in Great Britain to better understand the problem. The detail of the final report is due to be published later this year and will inform the Government’s response.
…
It is true that when the interim report was published in July this year, we were all disappointed to see that around one in eight women reported that they felt they had to leave work as a result of their pregnancy or maternity leave, but it also shows that the vast majority of employers believe it is important to support pregnant women and women on maternity leave, so we have to build on that. That is why the report will be so helpful in working out exactly what our response should be to make sure that we change this….
In relation to the fees for employment tribunals, on 11 June this year we announced a post-implementation review of the introduction of fees for employment tribunals. The review is being led by the Ministry of Justice. It is well under way and is due to report later this year. I think we should await the outcome of that review to determine whether current fees or the remission scheme need to be adjusted.
Equality law
“Pregnancy and maternity” is a protected characteristic under section 4 of the Equality Act 2010. Broadly speaking, the Act prohibits unfavourable treatment at work due to pregnancy or pregnancy-related illness, during the period between the start of pregnancy and the end of statutory maternity leave.
Pregnancy and maternity discrimination is also prohibited in non-work cases. For example, a café owner must not ask a woman to leave the café because she is breast-feeding her baby.
Protection from dismissal
Alongside the Equality Act, under the Employment Rights Act 1996, an employee will be regarded as unfairly dismissed if the reason or principal reason for the dismissal relates to pregnancy, childbirth or maternity. Selection for redundancy due to pregnancy or maternity leave is automatically unfair.
Maternity leave and the right to return to one’s job
The right to maternity leave is set out in Part 8 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Part 2 of the Maternity and Parental Leave etc. Regulations 1999 (SI 1999/3312). There are three types: compulsory maternity leave, ordinary maternity leave and additional maternity leave:
The distinction between ordinary and additional maternity leave relates to the employee’s right to return to the same job. If the employee returns to work during ordinary maternity leave she is entitled to the same job, with the same terms and conditions. If she returns to work during additional maternity leave she is entitled to return to the same job or, if it is not reasonably practicable for the employer to permit her to return to that job, to another job which is appropriate for her to do in the circumstances.
Time off for ante-natal care
The right to time off in respect of ante-natal care is provided in Part 6 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. A pregnant employee/agency worker is entitled to paid time off to attend an ante-natal care appointment made on the advice of a registered medical practitioner, midwife or registered nurse.
The Children and Families Act 2014 amended the Employment Rights Act 1996, introducing a right to unpaid time off to accompany a pregnant woman “when she attends by appointment at any place for the purpose of receiving ante-natal care”. Employees/agency workers with a “qualifying relationship” with the expectant mother or child are entitled to a maximum of two periods of time off, each limited to six and a half hours. The qualifying relationships include, for example, spouses, prospective fathers and persons in enduring family relationships with pregnant women.
Maternity Discrimination - Westminster Hall debate (453 KB , PDF)
This paper provides the latest statistics and analysis of employment, unemployment, economic inactivity and earnings in the UK.
Average Earnings: Regularly updated data on average weekly earnings, including breakdowns by public and private sectors.
This paper provides figures for the number of people claiming unemployment benefits (the “claimant count”) for the UK and by parliamentary constituency.