Chairs of Commons select committees since 2010
House of Commons select committee chairs in the 2024, 2019, 2017, 2015 and 2010 parliaments.
Prayer motions are used by MPs to call for negative statutory instruments to be annulled, revoked, or not made.
Prayers against Statutory Instruments in the House of Commons since 1997 (33KB Excel spreadsheet, XLSX)
Statutory instruments are the most common type of delegated legislation (also known as ‘secondary legislation’). Ministers use delegated legislation to make changes to the law under powers delegated to them in an Act of Parliament (also known as ‘primary legislation’).
The Act of Parliament that contains the power to make delegated legislation usually specifies what needs to happen to a statutory instrument for it to become law. Most statutory instruments are presented to the House of Commons and the House of Lords. Some, mainly those involving finance, are presented to the House of Commons only. Many statutory instruments are not subject to any parliamentary procedure.
Where parliamentary procedure applies, a statutory instrument must be formally presented to Parliament. When statutory instruments are formally presented to Parliament they are said to be ‘laid’, and when a minister has signed them into law they are said to be ‘made’.
Statutory instruments can be laid in draft or as a made instrument. Statutory instruments usually take one of two routes:
A prayer motion can be used by members of either House to object to a negative statutory instrument. In the Commons, a prayer motion is usually a particular type of early day motion tabled against a negative instrument. Prayers can be ‘fatal’ or ‘non-fatal’.
A fatal prayer is a motion seeking to overturn a negative instrument. It will commonly include the wording, ‘That a humble Address be presented to His Majesty, praying that [the instrument] be annulled’. Fatal prayers tabled against a draft negative are often phrased, ‘That the draft instrument be not made’.
A fatal prayer must be tabled within a 40-day objection period, which begins on the day the instrument is laid before Parliament. The objection period is known as praying time. For the prayer to successfully annul an instrument, it must also be agreed by the House within the 40-day period. A fatal prayer has not been successful in the Commons since 1979.
Fatal prayers are not often debated. While the government will typically find time to debate a prayer if it has been signed by a member of the opposition frontbench, it is not obliged to. And on occasions that it does, the instrument may be referred to a delegated legislation committee for consideration, rather than the motion being formally moved in the Commons Chamber. Prayers can also be considered on Opposition Days.
A non-fatal motion cannot stop an instrument being law but may be used by either House to indicate concern. In the Commons, a prayer motion tabled outside the 40-day objection period is non-fatal as it can only object to the instrument, rather than stop it. Sometimes an out-of-time prayer motion will mention the word ‘revocation’, but such a motion being agreed will not stop the instrument being law.
The downloadable Excel file lists number of prayers made in the House of Commons since 1997. Source details are available in the Excel file.
The Statutory Instrument Service tracks statutory instruments before Parliament and provides information on past statutory instruments (data is available from 2017 onwards). The service also has a query library which shows motions against statutory instruments tabled in both Houses.
Prayers can be viewed on Parliament’s Early Day Motions website.
The Parliament: Facts and figures series covers topics including elections, government, legislation, MPs and parliamentary business.
Please get in touch with us at papers@parliament.uk with comments, corrections, or if you would like to access the data in a different format.
Prayers against Statutory Instruments in the House of Commons since 1997 (33KB Excel spreadsheet, XLSX)
House of Commons select committee chairs in the 2024, 2019, 2017, 2015 and 2010 parliaments.
The Government of Jamaica has asked King Charles III to refer legal questions regarding enslavement to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
Urgent questions asked from the beginning of the 1997-98 session, including the title, date and names of the Speaker granting, MP asking and minister responding.